75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75 2174 Boyle R and Steno N
75/2174 Boyle, R. and Steno, N. Essays of the Strange Subtilty, Determinate Nature, Great Efficacy of Effluviums. To which are annext New Experiments to make Fire and Flame Ponderable. Together with A Discovery of the Perviousness of Glass. Also An Essay, about the Origine and Virtue of Gems. To which is added the Prodromus to a Dissertation concerning Solids naturally contained within Solids Giving an Account of the Earth, and its Productions. By Nicholas Steno. London, Printed by W.G. for M. Pitt, 1673, 1st ed., 2nd issue, 3 parts in 1 vol., 2 general title-p., 7 div. title-p., modern hcl.

- Large brown/ waterstain in blank upper inner margin causing severe deterioration of paper throughout and some lvs. loose(ning); new endpapers; sl. later owner's entry in pen and ink on verso of Steno title; ticket and owner's entry in pen and ink from the library of "Buitenzorgsche loge" and w. Japanese stamp(?) on first free endpaper.

= This edition of Boyle's important work on effluviums comprises 3 parts, of which the 1st part is subsequently divided in 5 parts, each having a separate title: 1. Strange subtitly of effluviums 2. Determinate nature of effluviums 3. Great efficacy of effluviums 4. New experiments to make fire and flame ponderable 5. A discovery of the perviousness of glass. The 2nd part is an essay on the origins and virtue of gems by Boyle and the 3rd part is an English translation of Steensen's work on solids (1st ed. De Solido intra solidum naturaliter contento, Florence, 1669) (these parts erroneously paginated but complete). This edition contains the title-page to part 1 as the 2nd preliminary leaf described under Fulton 106 as well as the title-p. described under 107. Fulton 107; PMM 141; Wing 3952. "Effluviums is one of the most important but perhaps less widely known works of Boyle and a most significant one. Had Boyle been bolder in his conclusions which he drew from his experiments on oxidisation, he would have forestalled phlogiston theory which was problematic to chemistry in the eighteenth century." (Fulton). SEE ILLUSTRATION PLATE LXXXIX.

€ (1.000-1.500)